ORACLE10gappend跟nologging插入对REDO的影响-成都创新互联网站建设

关于创新互联

多方位宣传企业产品与服务 突出企业形象

公司简介 公司的服务 荣誉资质 新闻动态 联系我们

ORACLE10gappend跟nologging插入对REDO的影响

ORACLE 10g append跟nologging插入对REDO的影响

/*+append*/ 

成都创新互联公司服务项目包括秦淮网站建设、秦淮网站制作、秦淮网页制作以及秦淮网络营销策划等。多年来,我们专注于互联网行业,利用自身积累的技术优势、行业经验、深度合作伙伴关系等,向广大中小型企业、政府机构等提供互联网行业的解决方案,秦淮网站推广取得了明显的社会效益与经济效益。目前,我们服务的客户以成都为中心已经辐射到秦淮省份的部分城市,未来相信会继续扩大服务区域并继续获得客户的支持与信任!

1.  append 属于direct insert,归档模式下append+table nologging会大量减少日志,

    非归档模式append会大量减少日志,append方式插入只会产生很少的undo

2.

综合一下吧:一是减少对空间的搜索;二是有可能减少redolog的产生。所以append方式会快很多,一般用于大数据量的处理
3. 建议不要经常使用append,这样表空间会一直在高水位上,除非你这个表只插不删
4.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

oracle append有什么作用?

请教一下,oracle中append是做什么用的。
  insert /*+append*/ into table1 select * from table2

在使用了append选项以后,insert数据会直接加到表的最后面,而不会在表的空闲块中插入数据。
使用append会增加数据插入的速度。
/*+APPEND*/的作用是在表的高水位上分配空间,不再使用表的extent中的空余空间
append 属于direct insert,归档模式下append+table nologging会大量减少日志,非归档模式append会大量减少日志,append方式插入只会产生很少的undo
不去寻找 freelist 中的free block , 直接在table HWM 上面加入数据。

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

 

SQL> select * from v$version;


BANNER

----------------------------------------------------------------

Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Prod

PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production

CORE    10.2.0.1.0      Production

TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production

NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.1.0 – Production


1.非归档模式append,nologging,append+nologging 三种情况数据产生REDO的对比


PHP:

SQL> archive log list
Database log mode              No Archive Mode
Automatic archival             Disabled
Archive destination            USE_DB_RECOVERY_FILE_DEST
Oldest online log sequence     13
Current log sequence           15

SQL> create table t as select * from dba_objects where 1=2;

Table created.

SQL> select name,value,class from v$sysstat where name='redo size';

NAME            VALUE      CLASS
---------- ---------- ----------
redo size      582728          2

SQL> insert into t select * from dba_objects;

10947 rows created.

SQL> select name,value,class from v$sysstat where name='redo size';

NAME            VALUE      CLASS
---------- ---------- ----------
redo size     1745704          2

SQL> insert /*+append*/ into t select * from dba_objects;

10947 rows created.

SQL> select name,value,class from v$sysstat where name='redo size';

NAME            VALUE      CLASS
---------- ---------- ----------
redo size     1839872          2

SQL> select (1745704-582728) redo1,(1839872-1745704) redo2 from dual;

     REDO1      REDO2
---------- ----------
   1162976     94168

SQL> drop table t;

Table dropped.

SQL> create table t nologging as select * from dba_objects where 1=2;

Table created.

SQL> select name,value,class from v$sysstat where name='redo size';

NAME            VALUE      CLASS
---------- ---------- ----------
redo size     3441836          2

SQL> insert into t select * from dba_objects;

10947 rows created.

SQL> select name,value,class from v$sysstat where name='redo size';

NAME            VALUE      CLASS
---------- ---------- ----------
redo size     4660204          2

SQL> insert /*+append*/ into t select * from dba_objects;

10947 rows created.

SQL> select name,value,class from v$sysstat where name='redo size';

NAME            VALUE      CLASS
---------- ---------- ----------
redo size     4667180          2

SQL> select (4660204-3441836) redo1,(4667180-4660204) redo2 from dual;

     REDO1      REDO2
---------- ----------
   1218368       6976

2.归档下:append,nologging,append+nologging 三种情况数据产生REDO的对比

PHP语言:SQL> select flashback_on from v$database;

FLASHBACK_ON
------------------
NO

SQL> archive log list
Database log mode              Archive Mode
Automatic archival             Enabled
Archive destination            USE_DB_RECOVERY_FILE_DEST
Oldest online log sequence     13
Next log sequence to archive   15
Current log sequence           15
SQL> select log_mode from v$database;

LOG_MODE
------------
ARCHIVELOG

SQL> create table t as select * from dba_objects where 1=2;

Table created.

SQL> select name,value from v$sysstat where name='redo size';

NAME            VALUE
---------- ----------
redo size      155624

SQL> insert into t select * from dba_objects;

10947 rows created.

SQL> select name,value from v$sysstat where name='redo size';

NAME            VALUE
---------- ----------
redo size     1316420

SQL> insert /*+append*/ into t select * from dba_objects;

10947 rows created.

SQL> select name,value from v$sysstat where name='redo size';

NAME            VALUE
---------- ----------
redo size     2461876

SQL> select (1316420-155624) redo1,(2461876-1316420) redo2 from dual;

     REDO1      REDO2
---------- ----------
   1160796    1145456

SQL> truncate table t;

Table truncated.

SQL> alter table t nologging;

Table altered.

SQL> select name,value from v$sysstat where name='redo size';

NAME            VALUE
---------- ----------
redo size     2505320

SQL> insert into t select * from dba_objects;

10947 rows created.

SQL> select name,value from v$sysstat where name='redo size';

NAME            VALUE
---------- ----------
redo size     3667856

SQL> insert /*+append*/ into t select * from dba_objects;

10947 rows created.

SQL> select name,value from v$sysstat where name='redo size';

NAME            VALUE
---------- ----------
redo size     3670424

SQL> select (3667856-2505320) redo1,(3670424-3667856) redo2 from dual;

     REDO1      REDO2
---------- ----------
   1162536       2568


总结:

 

 normal
 append
 nologging
 Append+nologging
 
 
Noarchive
 1162976
 94168
 1218368
 6976
 
 
Archive
 1160796
 1145456
 1162536
 2568
 
 

 

可以看出

1. 不管哪种模式下append要与nologging方式联用才能达到很好的效果。

2. 非归档与归档方式,只用NOLOGGING是不起效果的。

3. 非归档下append已达到不错的效果,但不及与nologging的联用方式。

4. 归档下单append起不到效果。


NOLOGGING插完后最好做个备份。


另外,如果库处在FORCELOGGING模式下,此时的nologging方式是无效的,这个我也测试过。


ITPUB上也有关于NOLOGGING何时生效的讨论

http://www.itpub.net/showthread.php?threadid=239905

eygle也做过这个实验

http://www.eygle.com/faq/Nologging&append.htm

 

 

 

Originally posted by jwzl at 2004-12-6 09:02:
我想确认一下/*+append*/系统到底会不会写日志,
很多人说不写日志,但怎么还有另外一个参数nologing,
如果真的没有写日志,也是很麻烦的

写的日志量不同^_^.
汇总一下下面的例子中关于redo log的信息.
pure insert                587624  
insert with nologging  585496  
insert with append 2240  
insert with append & nologging 400  

[quote]
Connected to:
Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.4.0 - Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Oracle Data Mining options
JServer Release 9.2.0.4.0 - Production

SQL> drop table t;

Table dropped.
SQL> create table t nologging as select * from dba_objects where null = null;

Table created.

SQL> set autot traceonly stat
SQL> insert into t select * from dba_objects;

5888 rows created.

Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
        271  recursive calls
        773  db block gets
      12653  consistent gets
          0  physical reads
     587624  redo size
        617  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
        539  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
          3  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          2  sorts (memory)
          0  sorts (disk)
       5888  rows processed

SQL> insert into t nologging select * from dba_objects;

5888 rows created.

Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
         28  recursive calls
        721  db block gets
      12654  consistent gets
          0  physical reads
     585496  redo size
        618  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
        549  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
          3  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          1  sorts (memory)
          0  sorts (disk)
       5888  rows processed

SQL> insert /*+append*/ into t select * from dba_objects;

5888 rows created.

Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
         29  recursive calls
         31  db block gets
      12526  consistent gets
          0  physical reads
       2240  redo size
        603  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
        551  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
          3  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          1  sorts (memory)
          0  sorts (disk)
       5888  rows processed

SQL> commit;

Commit complete.

SQL> insert /*+append*/ into t nologging select * from dba_objects;

5888 rows created.

Statistics
----------------------------------------------------------
          7  recursive calls
          8  db block gets
      12517  consistent gets
          0  physical reads
        400  redo size
        603  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
        561  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
          3  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          1  sorts (memory)
          0  sorts (disk)
       5888  rows processed

SQL> commit;

Commit complete.

SQL> exit


当前文章:ORACLE10gappend跟nologging插入对REDO的影响
本文链接:http://kswsj.cn/article/gigeho.html

其他资讯